<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan Froelich, EdTech Incendiary &#187; current</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danthetechguy.net/tag/current/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danthetechguy.net</link>
	<description>Moodle Using, Blogging, Tweet-a-holic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:59:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter meets CNN: Who needs a news anchor?</title>
		<link>http://danthetechguy.net/2008/10/03/twitter-meets-cnn-who-needs-a-news-anchor/</link>
		<comments>http://danthetechguy.net/2008/10/03/twitter-meets-cnn-who-needs-a-news-anchor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 01:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danthetechguy.net/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I believe news anchors are vital to our coverage of current events, but I am watching the Vice Presidential debate at home and came across HACK THE DEBATE. Now, I don&#8217;t know what will be visible once you click on the link, but here&#8217;s a run down of what it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I believe news anchors are vital to our coverage of current events, but I am watching the Vice Presidential debate at home and came across <a href="http://current.com/topics/88834922_hack_the_debate" target="_blank">HACK THE DEBATE</a>.</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t know what will be visible once you click on the link, but here&#8217;s a run down of what it was when it was live. You&#8217;ll need to understand two major components that went into creating this:</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://current.com/s/about.htm" target="_blank">CurrentTV </a>- a television station that broadcasts programs created by the audience&#8230;in essence it what web 2.0 is, but for television. It came about in 2005 and has been on the air 24/7 since then. Current.com came about a few years later as a way for the audience to be involved even further.</p>
<p>2. <a href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> &#8211; a microblogging site that supports instant blog posts, limited to 140 characters (about the length of a standard text message). Twitter is part social network, part blog site. Twitter&#8217;s power lies in the built in features that allow <em>tweets </em>to mesh with other programs.</p>
<p>So what was on current.com during the VP debate? Think: VH1&#8242;s pop-up video meets CNN. As people posted their tweets marked with a tag #current, they would pop-up, in real time, on the Current TV airing of the debate. Most of the comments were relevant and appropriate with only a few making comments that were less than appropriate.</p>
<p>This is powerful! This is amazing! I can&#8217;t get enough of web 2.0 mash-ups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danthetechguy.net/2008/10/03/twitter-meets-cnn-who-needs-a-news-anchor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

